![]() I have heard good things about Sequoia and Samplitude uses the same audio engine (I'll be checking soon to see if the SRC is the same for 96k work). Prosoniq's SonicWorks SRC seems pretty good, but still not sufficient for converting a mix compared to starting at 44.1 and staying there. I've also tested several SRC algorithms and I haven't found many that don't damage the high end (artifacts). Since the Nyquist frequency of 44.1k is above human hearing, we are talking about harmonics and how the upper frequencies are handled when processed in a mix. ![]() Sample rate determines captured frequency response (which also translates to clarity, but for different reasons). Even higher frequencies at lower levels become more noticeable, adding to the "clarity" perception even if the sampling frequency wouldn't seem to imply that gain. of decaying frequencies (reverbs, ambience). The frequency response advantage of 48k is minimal (8.8% increase in frequency response to be exact), where the dangers of using a poor SRC program or algorithm are much more audible.īit depth yields more range for perceived depth and clarity in a track or mix - esp. I was attempting to point out by comparison, that there are advantages of 24-bit over 16 bit, and the conversion isn't nearly as damaging as SRC is for downsampling. 24 Bit give your recording a better DYNAMIC resolution (s/n-ratio and such) than 16 Bit, while 48k Sampling-Rate gives you a better FREQUENCY resolution than 44.1k. sorry Dedric, but you are combining things, you'd rather not mix up:īit Depth, Dithering, Sample-Rate and SRCĭither is applied, when you change the Bit Depth, i.e. This does work well, sounds very good, and doesn't have the same hazards as sample-rate conversion. If you decide to use 24-bit recording for live instruments or vocals, then Logic 5 has POW-r dithering for converting to 16-bit. ![]() Smooth and fast batch capabilities and extensive logging, allowing tens of thousands of files to be converted to multiple output formats in one run make BarbaBatch the production choice for 6 out of 10 top selling computer games producers.Īutomated CD ripping of faded snippets to many streaming sound formats make BarbaBatch ideal for delivery of web based audio.So the question is, what method have you found best to convert down to 16/44.1 and retain quality for a CD.Do you convert the original raw audio track first prior to the bounce, or do you do it in another fashion?ĭefinitely stay on 48k, where you started and convert the 16bit/48k-Bounce with a dedicated SRC-program! I made good experience with Barbabatch?I think it's called.logic's SRC doesn't cut it.IMHO The wide range of telephony formats together with dynamic compression and samplerate conversion that make low quality audio sound not as low as you'd expect, has made BarbaBatch exell in telephony audio. It supports 192kHz sampling rate and the Redbook CD image extraction has made it popular among mastering engineers. You can hear BarbaBatch in five out of ten top selling games, in the major navigation devices and in countless CD masters.īarbaBatch converts 50+ formats and its conversion quality and speed are unrivaled and for over a decade BarbaBatch has been winning awards and acclaim for this.īarbaBatch, with its unrivaled samplerate conversion algorithm, supports files like BWF, Sonic Solutions and 32 bit float files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |